All posts by Nick Taylor

Password Disabled Scam

 

by Nick Taylor

A new email phishing scam turned up in our in-box in the past couple of weeks. It looks like it’s from a bank, and it says your password has been disabled because it’s been entered incorrectly three times.

You’re given a SIGN ON box and a message: “To enable your password, please sign on and follow instructions.”

The laugher is the next paragraph: “We are dedicated to protecting your information. Learn about our security measures and what we do to protect you online.”

The first one of these allegedly came from Chase, a bank I actually use. I knew my password was good, but I always click on the name of the sender in the upper left hand corner. That gives the email address and it usually isn’t from any legitimate source.  Sure enough this address  had nothing to do with Chase.

A second scam email, precisely the same type, arrived a few days later.  This one looked like it came from SunTrust, complete with what appears to be the SunTrust logo.

 

I’ve never had a SunTrust account, so this was clearly a phishing expedition. If you’re a scammer and put enough lines in the water, some of them will reach customers of the bank you’re pretending to be. 

This one, though, was more clever at disguising its return address, which showed up as no_reply@sunsystem.com.  The real SunTrust return address would be suntrust.com.

So if you get an email or emails saying your password is disabled, take a couple of precautionary steps.  

Click on the sender’s address to see who’s really at the other end.

 If you’re not sure it’s somebody phishing to get at your financial information, go online and log on to your bank. That will tell you right away if there’s a problem with your password.

And if that’s the case, you should deal with it on what you’re sure is the bank’s website.  Don’t sign on using a window that arrives in even a slightly suspicious email.

Chase spokesperson Rebecca Acevedo suggests that you call the bank immediately if you detect fraud on your account.  

SunTrust, like Chase, told us that phishing is an industry-wide problem. Spokesperson Angela Amberg said, “SunTrust, like most other financial institutions, will never send emails asking for personal information …”  She also cautioned that, “Clients receiving these types of emails should not reply to the emails or click on the links.”

Chase provided good suggestions for protecting your account from hackers.

1. Sign up for account alerts. Your bank has tools to notify you of certain types of suspicious activity.

2. Make sure your contact information is up to date. This will ensure your card company or bank is able to reach you in the case of suspected fraud.

3. Sign up to access your credit and debit card statements online instead of in the mail, and monitor them every few days – or more frequently during busy shopping seasons. If you spot anything inaccurate or unauthorized, contact your bank’s customer service center immediately.

4. Shop at trusted retailers online and off. Only shop sites that are secure and begin with https as opposed to http.

5. Don’t give your credit or debit card information away via email or phone, and don’t respond to unsolicited emails. If you’re not sure, call the company in question (using a known and verified phone number).

6. Don’t swipe if you don’t have to. Use your chip-enabled EMV card or a mobile payment service wherever available.

7. Strengthen your password using numbers, letters and symbols. If you choose something simple or personal – like birth dates or your kids’ names – savvy hackers may be able to break the code by reading your profile on social media.

8. Another smart move is to download your bank’s mobile app to make payments securely online, eliminating the vulnerability from mailing a check. Also, the mobile app gives you the opportunity to check your account on the go.

9. Be careful when using public Wi-Fi to make a purchase via a smartphone or other device, as many public networking technologies are not protected with encryption. It’s best not to enter credit or debit card numbers or other private information when using public Wi-Fi. But if you must, only do so on secure websites which begin with “https.”

10. Make use of the lock feature on your smartphone. Using a password or pin to access the device keeps it safe should you misplace it or it gets stolen.

Latest On Cuisinart Blade Replacement

 

by Nick Taylor 

The latest information from Cuisinart surprised us. They replaced our riveted blade quickly when its parent company, Conair, recalled the blades last December after some of them broke up and left shards of metal in the food. Not everybody had the same experience.

One ConsumerMojo viewer, Inara F.,  wrote to say she had filled out Cuisinart’s online form before Christmas to have two faulty blades replaced, but as of January 4 she hadn’t received them.  And, she added, “the customer service number is always busy.”

Now it turns out that Cuisinart isn’t as on top of things as we had thought.  Today we got an email thanking us for our patience and saying that our new blade “could be shipped any time between 2/6/17 and 2/20/17.”  We apologize, the message continued, for any inconvenience.

Cuisinart processors are a fixture in almost every kitchen we’ve been in. Ours would be hard to do without, and we’re not alone in that. And we grant that it’s not easy to replace 8 million blades for one of the country’s most popular kitchen appliances. 

As the Cuisinart email said, its “blades are fabricated using precise manufacturing processes, which . . . means they take some time to produce.” But they’re working as fast as they can “to meet the enormous demand resulting from this replacement program.”  

That’s fine. We tip our hat. But we hope we weren’t outliers when we got our new blade so quickly in December, and we hope Cuisinart sends somebody else our replacement blade, since we don’t need it and apparently a lot of other people do.

The Free Press Under Trump

 

 

by Nick Taylor

Why should consumers care whether we have a free press? Whatever your politics, whomever you voted for, doesn’t really matter here. Truth, however, does matter. A free and honest press brings the news of the day into our homes and keeps us informed about the things we should know.

At a very local level, we care about garbage pickup, water running from our taps, safe streets and may even whether we can get a parking spot. Local reporters help us keep tabs on what’s happening with our local governments, our communities, and the people who deliver needed services. If it doesn’t work, if there is corruption, we need to know about it.

It works the same way on the national level. We need to know when programs like Social Security and Medicare are threatened, when access to health insurance is undermined, when women don’t get the health care they deserve or equal pay for equal work, when low wage workers aren’t supported, when clean air and water regulations are rolled back, when import tariffs are likely to raise food prices, and a thousand other things vital to the average family’s security and viability.

A vigorous, free and un-intimidated press has never been as important as it is right now. Neither is the First Amendment that protects free speech.

Donald Trump’s White House thinks the news media “should keep its mouth shut.” Sorry, conspiracy peddler and chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon, that’s not going to happen. You and Kellyanne Conway and DJT aren’t getting free rein to drip “alternative facts” into the heads of Americans.

Bannon’s declaration that news organizations are “the opposition party” follows Trump’s comments that much of the media is “very, very dishonest” and makes up fake news.

That is shorthand for news that shows him at less than what he believes is his full measure of tremendousness.

In fact, the dishonesty begins with him and his enablers. There’s a reason George Orwell’s 1984, first published in 1949 as a look at a dystopian future in which the government declares “War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength” has jumped to the top of the best-seller lists in the past week.

Orwell makes the point more directly in Politics and the English Language, published two years earlier: “Political language . . . is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give the appearance of solidity to pure wind.”

The press in America, from the pamphleteering days of Thomas Paine, has existed to pursue and state the truth despite the wishes of the powerful. And the vast majority of newspapers and broadcast news operations do just that, despite what naysayers like Rush Limbaugh and Breitbart News, where Bannon was recently in charge, would have you believe.

The right to speak and write freely is enshrined in the First Amendment to the Constitution, a right so important it preceded all the others.

No White House thugs mirroring Orwell and calling real news fake and fake news real are going to change that.

Pushback Against Trump’s Anti-Immigrant Order

 

by Nick Taylor 

Pushback began as soon as President Trump issued his executive order that threatens to cut off funds for sanctuary cities if they don’t join federal deportation orders. 

Thousands of protestors took to the streets in New York and rallied in Washington Square Park.

 

 

And you saw the instant reaction on Twitter with hashtags like  #ImmigrantsWelcome, #NoBanNoWall and #StandIndivisible.

 

And on other social media including Facebook, immigrant rights groups and lawyers offered support and guidance.

Perhaps more significantly, elected officials around the country also spoke out quickly and firmly in opposition to the plan that White House press secretary Sean Spicer described at his press briefing. “We’re going to strip federal grant money from the sanctuary states and cities that harbor illegal immigrants. The American people are no longer going to have to be forced to subsidize this disregard for our laws,” Spicer said. 

New York City receives close to $9 billion in federal funding, nearly 9 percent of its annual budget. Some of that money goes toward the NYPD’s intelligence and counterterrorism budget, child protective services, HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment, and housing vouchers affecting 39,000 families, according to the real estate site Curbed,

 

But Mayor Bill de Blasio threatened to sue the Trump Administration if it withdraws money. He said, “The executive order will not change how we enforce the law or how we do business on behalf of the people, all 8.5 million New Yorkers. We have half a million New Yorkers who are undocumented and they are part of the fabric of this city.” He went on to say, “We are going to defend all of our people regardless of where they come from, regardless of their immigration status.”

Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago and Boston are among the other major cities that shield law-abiding immigrants from round-up and deportation and their mayors clearly said they will not participate in an attack on immigrants.

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emmanuel told The New York Times, “We’re going to stay a sanctuary city. There is no stranger among us.”

And Boston Mayor Martin J. Walsh said, “To anyone who feels threatened today, or vulnerable, you are safe in Boston.” And he also made it plain on Twitter.

 

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo says the state remains a “refuge” for those who feel threatened by Trump’s deportation policies.

The president’s order apparently stands on shaky legal ground. Courts have ruled that funds can be cut only if the programs the money goes to are directly related to immigration. California takes the position that under the 10th Amendment to the Constitution, local governments can’t be made to enforce federal laws.

Conservative governors, however, are making similar financial threats. Austin, Texas, the state’s capital and the seat of Travis County, is a sanctuary city. Governor Greg Abbott has told Travis County Sheriff Sally Hernandez he’ll cut off $1.8 million in state grants if her deputies don’t start rounding up illegals. And he said he’d try to remove her from office.

For the time being, the nearly 800,000 young people covered by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program started in 2012 appear to be unaffected by Trump’s executive order. Immigration hawks are trying to change that, however.

 

Will Government Programs You Depend On Disappear?

Will government programs you depend upon disappear? Republicans, and you may register in that column, intend to weaken or destroy programs that Americans have taken for granted since the 1930s and newer ones that tens of millions rely upon. These programs created and sustain a middle class that’s the greatest and most prosperous in the history of the world. They shelter ordinary people from the hurricanes of life.

Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, civil rights and voting rights, and protections for workers, consumers, women, immigrants and anybody who’s not straight, and our public lands and air and water, lie in jeopardy. Effective public schools, wage and hour laws, restrictions on child labor, laws that allow collective bargaining by unions, and affordable health insurance could all go out the window.

Why do Republicans opposed these laws and programs? They’re broadly popular. They’re popular because they show effective government at work.

Today’s Republicans, however, don’t believe the government should work this way. Their rigid doctrine, unmoved by empathy, rejects the idea that there is a compact with the citizens that calls on government to step in when the chips are down, or when people are exploited.

So if government shouldn’t do this, they can’t let it. And when people are left wanting, Republicans then blame government in general and argue against the taxes that support it.

This argument goes back generations. Herbert Hoover, the millionaire mining engineer elected president in 1928, refused to unleash the power of the government to solve the unemployment and homelessness and starvation that rolled in with the Great Depression.

The Paul Ryan’s, the Mitch McConnells, the Donald Trumps live in the same world of fictional individualism. They’re blind to the real world in which, when people suffer unexpected troubles, they need their government and there’s no one else. Their blindness is their ideology.

Franklin Roosevelt succeeded Hoover and rewrote the compact between government and citizens. FDR’s New Deal recognized for the first time the responsibility the nation bore for its people. The depression had exposed the cruelties of laissez faire economics and the need to give, as no other entity could do, workers and the old and unemployed a fighting chance.

Translate the reaction and rhetoric, indeed the players, from then to now and hardly anyone can tell the difference. The rich man’s anti-New Deal coalition, calling itself the Liberty League, formed in 1934 with du Pont gunpowder and J.P. Morgan banking money. Then, as now, there were no effective limits on campaign contributions, and the du Ponts alone poured almost $1 million into the 1936 Republican campaign.

Just as the du Ponts foreshadowed Sheldon Adelson and Charles and David Koch, the Liberty League’s script gave a taste of right wing talk today. It promised an “unremitting” fight against “government encroachment upon the rights of citizens.” Lammot du Pont argued that “all government regulation of business . . . should be abolished.” His son Irenee du Pont talked about makers versus takers: “The Roosevelt administration practices the socialistic maxim ‘work like hell so that the parasites may get the benefit of your labor.'” And whenever Democrats mentioned the yawning gap between the richest Americans and all the rest, Republicans charged them with waging class warfare.

Reading socialism or worse into the New Deal was standard fare. The script hasn’t changed in eighty years. The Affordable Care Act, which extended health insurance to 20 million Americans who didn’t have it, is “socialized medicine” in the Republican playbook as they rush to repeal it with no replacement plan.

Now the smell of blood is in the air. Republicans are drooling in anticipation of Trump’s inauguration. So after the most vicious, intemperate, thuggish campaign from the right in modern history and the Electoral College victory of a narcissist authoritarian who trailed his opponent by nearly three million popular votes, who has chosen cabinet appointees who oppose the work of the departments they’re supposed to head, we are poised to return to what Arthur Schlesinger Jr. called “the old order” that preceded the New Deal.

The anti-government right has worked at this for years. And when they snatch away what have been fundamental facts of American life for as long as three generations, Americans will suffer.

President Obama urged citizens to take part and speak up.

If this matters to you, call the people who represent you in Washington. 

Here’s where to find your representative: http://www.house.gov/htbin/findrep

Here’s where to find your senator:

https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact/

 

 

Cuisinart Acts Quickly To Replace Blade

 

by Nick Taylor

Surprise! Our new Cuisinart blade arrived by FedEx on Saturday, two days after I filled out the online form for a replacement. Somebody at Conair, the company that owns Cuisinart, figured out how to do this right. 

This all happened quickly. We learned about the recall on December 13 and we reported that Cuisinart recalled 8 million potentially dangerous metal blades used by the popular food processor. We cook a lot and with the holidays coming up, I wondered how long it would take to get the new blade so that we could use the machine. 

Like a lot of other home cooks, Barbara plotted alternative strategies, none of them as good as the Cuisinart. The new blade’s quick arrival solved that problem.

The rivetless blade came in a small, sturdy cardboard box. It’s not that easy to fish out the new blade, but that’s intentional. Cuisinart users know how sharp those blades are, so its important that edges and fingers don’t come into contact.

Once you get the blade out, the box is designed as a disposal package for the old one. The stiff cardboard not only protects your fingers, but also keeps the blade’s sharp edges from harming sanitation workers who will be picking up your trash.

Even that’s a challenge here in New York City, where we recycle almost everything and paper and cardboard (the package) go in different bags from metal and plastic (the blade). But I think it’s a good guess to sacrifice the cardboard in favor of the workers’ fingers and put the whole package in with your metal and plastic recycling.

And finally, congratulations to Conair and Cuisinart for their quick turnaround on the replacement blades. 

To replace your blade go to: https://recall.cuisinart.com/ or call 1-877-339-2534.  They staff the line on Sundays from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EST and during the week from 7:00 a.m. to 11 p.m. EST. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is Your Cuisinart Blade Dangerous?

 

by Nick Taylor

Barbara and I have used a Cuisinart food processor since forever. So when she turned on the NBC Nightly News the other night while she chopped onions, we took notice of a report explaining that Cuisinart metal blades might fracture leaving sharp shards in your food.

The story said the affected blades were affixed by rivets to the plastic central shaft. We looked at our Cuisinart blade and sure enough, it had rivets. And a closer look revealed a hairline crack at one of the rivets, just as the broadcast had described.

We cook at home a lot and hardly a day passes when we don’t employ the Cuisinart in all its pulsing, chopping, pureeing versatility. So, what to do?

Cuisinart voluntarily issued the recall and alerted the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The company news release says, “Conair and Cuisinart take the safety of its customers very seriously.”

We learned Cuisinart recalled 8 million of the potentially dangerous blades, but that only certain models were involved. Later stories said that nervous users had deluged the company’s phone lines with questions, and that the Cuisinart recall website was overwhelmed as well.

I didn’t have a problem. I went online to the recall website two days after the Cusinart announced the recall, and found things laid out very clearly. There’s a photograph of the blade type that’s being recalled, and a list of recalled model numbers. The site also tells you what blades are not recalled.

You can easily find the model number on your blade and machine. Ours was DSC-8, and it was clearly embossed on the top of the blade shaft. If not there, it appears along with other product information on the bottom of the Cuisinart itself. It takes sharp eyes to find it, but it’s there.

There’s a simple form at the top of the page that lets you register for the recall if your food processor is one of those involved.

What’s not there is any indication of when your new blade might arrive. And as The New York Times pointed out in a story, with the holidays just around the corner, home cooks are pulsing and chopping with their Cuisinarts more than they might normally. They don’t want to lose a labor-saving kitchen tool. So how long can they expect to wait?

We asked this questions in an email to Cuisinart’s media relations department and will let you know when they respond.

Meanwhile, to learn if the recall affects your blade call Cuisinart Customer Service at 1-877-339-2534, or go online at https://recall.cuisinart.com/.

Remembering John Glenn

 

by Nick Taylor

I knew John Glenn and worked with him closely as the co-writer of the best-selling John Glenn: A Memoir, published in 1999 after his return to space. With his death December 8 at ninety-five, the media calls started and I began recalling John’s intimate side, the things that made him our last great national hero.

John was special because he never acted like a hero. He never gave an air of being privileged or entitled. I never saw him treat a celebrity differently from someone unknown; he responded as if they all deserved his time.

The first time I met him was in his Senate office. He was in the last year of his fourth term and was calling it quits to train for a return to space as history’s oldest astronaut, thirty-seven years after he’d been the first American to orbit the earth. Amid this flurry of events, he was sitting at a large round table with a stack of photographs in front of him. He signed them one by one without an auto-pen in sight. His public deserved his personal signature as well.

The definition of what makes a hero is a lot cheaper than it used to be. I think a hero is someone who does what needs to be done no matter what it takes, who believes that that is what’s expected and it’s no big deal.

John grew up in the Depression of the 1930s. He thought his family would break up until his father, a plumber, found a job working for the Works Progress Administration, the New Deal program that provided work for millions of jobless Americans. His country had kept his family together, and in the small town of New Concord, Ohio, patriotism ran in the blood.

So it was natural that he became a Marine combat pilot during World War II and flew in combat again during the Korean War. He was curious enough and brave enough to want to know what he was made of, so after Korea he became a test pilot and set a transcontinental speed record. He and a ten-year-old Mississippi boy partnered to win the grand prize on “Name That Tune.” And then the Mercury program selected him as one of seven original astronauts. All because he was determined and brave and didn’t swell up about it.

The nation watched rapt during his orbital flight in February 1962. Many gathered in front of department store windows where TVs on display played the live broadcast. And we held our breath in shock and fear when, on re-entry, ground control lost touch with him. And when we heard his voice again and knew he was safe, the relief breathed out from coast to coast.

He became such a hero after that flight — the biggest ticker tape parade in New York’s history — that President John Kennedy kept him from another flight. He thought the nation couldn’t stand to lose John Glenn. Which was fine with John’s wife Annie but not with John.

Annie was another quest of John’s. They had always been together. She stuttered, and he didn’t care. But when the spotlight fell on him it fell on her as well. His life wasn’t whole without her beside him, and when they learned of a promising program that might help her conquer the affliction she signed up with his support. It worked, and Annie became as bright a public figure as her husband.

John’s Senate career and his brief presidential bid came from the same place as his military and NASA service; it was simply what you did for your country. He believed government played a role in people’s lives and he wanted it to be good and effective in that role.

courtesy Nasa

But he never gave up wanting to go back into space, and in the late 1990s convinced NASA to put him aboard a Space Shuttle flight to, among other duties, be a human guinea pig to see what would happen to the elderly in space. He was seventy-seven when Discovery launched in October 1998. He orbited this time for nine days instead of the five hours and three orbits of his first flight.

That first time, he saw the sun rise and set three times. He told me that what he saw through his small window was an ecstatic beauty, enhanced for the first time by new colors against the curve of the earth. “I collect sunsets,” he said. “Photos, but mostly memories, from the time I was young. They’re God’s masterpieces.” He would remember his first sunset from space.

Even after his second flight, the renewed attention, the accolades that came with it, John never lost the common touch. Once Barbara and I dined with him and Annie when he was in New York to receive some award. They were staying at the Pierre Hotel, and John noticed that guests put their shoes in the hall outside their rooms to be shined overnight.

“I don’t understand that,” he said. “I can shine my own shoes. I always have.”

Why People Fear a Trump Regime

 

by Nick Taylor

Many people are afraid in Donald Trump’s alt.right America. His appointment of Breitbart News chief Stephen Bannon, first to chair his campaign and now to advise him in the White House, legitimizes white supremacist rhetoric and attacks and harassment of people who oppose it.

People of color, people whose dress or name signals their religion, people who speak English haltingly or not at all, same sex couples, women who don’t take shit, and people who accept and embrace those people — we’re all targets.

Thousands have filled the streets to protest this vile eruption. But a lot of others just want to lead their lives. They need to do their jobs and raise their kids and pay the rent and put food on the table.

What are they to do? Some spent years disguising who and what they are before leaving the shadows to join a society that until November 8 had begun to seem more tolerant. Now racist and religious and social vigilantes are on the prowl again. How can their targets avoid their attention? Not many of them can do what I did years ago.

Let me say first that I’m a white man Donald Trump’s age. I grew up in the South, unlike him not rich but like him, I experienced white privilege. Only once did I feel the need to put on a disguise. It haunts me still. 

I was a college junior in 1966 when I joined some friends on a drive to New Orleans for Mardi Gras. We set out from Western Carolina College in Cullowhee, North Carolina, quartered through Georgia and entered Alabama where the road signs announced Opelika and Auburn up ahead.

Our college had integrated peacefully two years earlier. We took it for granted, but not everybody did. Alabama was ground zero for the civil rights movement, then in full swing. Alabama State troopers had beaten voting rights marchers in Selma just the year before. Television coverage of “Blood Sunday” showed the nation just how far Alabamians would go to protect the Jim Crow status quo. They were especially suspicious of  outsiders.

We were five white boys, but our driver was from Florida and his car had Florida plates. A car, not a pickup truck, but a new Dodge hardtop with a 426 hemi V-8 engine. Those plates and that car marked us as outsiders. We felt pretty sure that we’d entered a place where we weren’t wanted and would be there for the next 250 miles.

Then we’d be in Mississippi, and if any place viewed outsiders with less charity than Alabama, it would be it’s western neighbor.

We decided to camouflage ourselves, to go from outsiders to insiders.  We pulled into the first roadside stand we found that offered souvenirs. And among the rebel flags and firecrackers on display we found what we were looking for. The license plate bore the requisite stars and bars and the words: “If your heart ain’t in Dixie, get your ass out!”

We propped this edifying sentiment up in the Dodge’s rear window and drove on to the Big Easy confident in our disguise. We drank and caroused at Mardi Gras, deployed our camouflage license plate again on the return drive, and ditched it the minute we didn’t need it any more.

Looking back, our camouflage was also a cop-out. We escaped undesired attention, but we did it by flying the colors of the people we most opposed and feared. I wonder if Donald Trump has any idea what it’s like to live, for any time at all, as somebody you’re not.

Today’s outsiders in Trump’s America can’t hide as easily as white boys in a fast car driving through Alabama in 1966. They can’t, they shouldn’t have to, and those of us who can hide shouldn’t. We need to shed our camouflage and stand with them.

The license plate I’d buy today would say, “America is ALL the people!” 

 

Working Class Blues Escape Democrats

 

by Nick Taylor

The Democratic Party in 2016 forgot its New Deal roots. Franklin Roosevelt’s programs planted the seeds for working and middle class prosperity the likes of which the world had never seen in states like Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Wisconsin. 

But a changing world, technology and globalism closed factories and tarnished working class prosperity there, and this escaped the Democrats.  Hillary Clinton’s campaign failed to understand and adequately address the economic anguish of blue collar workers in key states it thought were safely Democratic.

Would it have made any difference if it had? Maybe not. The bottom line in this election, or one of them at least, is that not enough voters trusted Clinton.  A Democratic platform is always better for people below the 1 percent, but she had too much clutter in her background for that message to break through.  

Ed, a voter in Portsmouth, Ohio, explained his vanished optimism to a Hillary caller a few days before the election: “I’ve been good all my life. I’ve done everything right. Now I’m barely getting by and it ain’t gonna get no better.” He said that he’d written in Bernie Sanders in early voting. As for Hillary: “I know she’s got experience but she’s got years of buried bodies.” 

How did it come to that despite her experience and grasp of policy? One reason is the “vast right-wing conspiracy” that Clinton complained of back in 1998. People laughed at the time. But with the help of Rush Limbaugh, Richard Mellon Scaife, Fox News, the Citizens United organization, the Koch brothers, and seething 1960s-hating anti-baby boomers like Newt Gingrich, the right ginned up an unending series of Clinton “scandals.”

Whitewater, Travelgate and the death of Vincent Foster began a line that ran through Monica Lewinsky and continued unbroken to Benghazi and Hillary’s email server. Principled political opposition gave way to what Bill Clinton called, aptly, “the politics of personal destruction.”

Staggering amounts of public time and treasure slopped down the drain in these futile witch hunts. But they served the purpose of the right: they made people believe Hillary Clinton lied all the time and they couldn’t trust her.

The media did nothing to help. The right-wing outlets on cable and the web flogged every story until it dropped, and then kept flogging. Supposedly neutral cable outlets picked up the same chants. And the once-trusted and respected mainstream media covered these matters as battling talking points between left and right when objective reporting should have dismissed them altogether.

Hillary didn’t help either. She was at least partly a victim of her own unwillingness to open up. Her suspicions made her closed and inaccessible, controlled when she should have been spontaneous.

Now the Clintons are exiting the stage. Their day is over and the Democratic Party  finds itself shut out of every branch of government.

The vast right-wing conspiracy succeeded. The Democrats’ search for new faces and voices must begin today, and they must reclaim their roots among people who work hard with their hands as well as with their brains.

The Trumpian Ego

 

by Nick Taylor

The shock is wearing off as the implications of President-elect Trump beyond his crassness and bigotry and sexism begin to sink in. Already we hear that his threat to prosecute Hillary over the security failings of her private email server while secretary of state was essentially “just politics.”  And his statement calling for a ban on all Muslim immigration disappeared from his website. (It was later restored.) Maybe soon we’ll hear a lot less about a wall.

The one thing we know for certain about Trump is that he essentially believes in nothing beyond the satisfaction of his ego. I find this encouraging.

He won’t want to fail at the biggest job of his life. The early signs about his choice to lead the Environmental Protection Agency aren’t good. But what if he can win more praise for moving aggressively to solve climate change than ignoring it, especially if that praise comes from people whose esteem he values? Isn’t it likely that that’s what he will do?

Trump is a Republican by convenience, not conviction. He defied the party establishment on major issues. He said Social Security and Medicare should be preserved unchanged. He defended funding for Planned Parenthood and said it does a lot of good. Unlike his vice president-elect, he doesn’t seem concerned that gay marriage and transgender rights are advancing. If Democrats do a better job of massaging his ego on their matters of agreement, it bodes well at least on certain issues.

We might not get a liberal Supreme Court justice out of Trump. But if a respected moderate appointee won him bouquets of praise from the broad middle of the political spectrum, would he go that route?

That probably means those of us who opposed Trump should resist reminding one and all that he was in fact the loser in this race. He won the electoral vote, a vestigial remnant from our founding designed to inject sober-minded responsible citizens between the people and demagogues who might inspire them to foolishness or worse. “A disaster for a democracy,” Trump called the electoral college after the 2012 election. Now it’s put him on the road to the White House.

His public statements so far have been gracious and appropriate, the words of a winner. Let’s not poke that fragile ego by harping on the news that more voters cast ballots for Hillary.

One thing is sure in the wake of this election, and it’s not a bad thing.  It’s a big wakeup call to both parties that half the people in the country are fed up with Washington, overrun with lobbyists that put the business and banking and technology and fossil fuel agenda into the ears of Congress. Citizens suffered in the terrible recession that started in 2008, and the people that caused that suffering went scot-free.

Companies paid fines, nothing more than one of the costs of doing business. Nobody went to jail. No executives in handcuffs were paraded in a perp walk to spend time behind bars. None of them lost their freedom or the comforts of home. Americans saw that and they made up their minds that it wasn’t fair, that both parties were to blame, and that something had to be done.

Trump is their vengeance. But maybe, just maybe, there’s hope in the idea that he’ll turn around Mario Cuomo’s phrase that you campaign in poetry, but govern in prose. If there’s flattery to be found in statehood and actually making government work, who knows, maybe the ugly prose of Trump’s campaign will be replaced, maybe not with poetry but at least the occasional rhyme.. 

 

Presidents Who Scared The Nation

 

by Nick Taylor

Trump isn’t the first. We have had presidents who frightened and outraged the nation before. Somehow we got through their terms. I was lying in bed this morning feeling dread from the election results when I heard a New York City street sweeper coming down my block whisking up the refuse. I smiled. The world hadn’t ended on one terrible night.

American presidential history brings us face-to-face with many moments that made citizens question their democracy and its survival.  

Andrew Jackson was a populist icon denied the presidency in 1824 despite earning a plurality of popular and electoral votes. The House decided that election when Henry Clay, one of the four candidates, supported the second place finisher John Quincy Adams.  He won the elections of 1828 and  1832.

Whig Vice President Millard Fillmore became president in 1850 after Zachary Taylor died in office, wasn’t nominated when his term ended, and ran on the “Know Nothing” ticket on a nativist, anti-Catholic platform in 1856.  He carried one state. 

Democrat James Buchanan, elected in 1856, lacked the moral courage to stand up to slave state secession and his waffling ushered in the Civil War.  He was also probably the first gay president, but that wasn’t a campaign asset in those days.  

Republican Warren G. Harding played cards and drank whiskey in the White House with crooked cronies he appointed to the cabinet.  He presided over the 1920s’ Teapot Dome scandal, in which oil companies bribed their way into cheap oil leases on U.S. Navy land.  He was handsome, though, maybe his main asset as a politician, since women voted for the first time in 1920.  He won what was then an unprecedented 61 percent majority. 

Herbert Hoover was a conservative Republican and a successful mining engineer whose business skills and World War I relief work made him secretary of commerce under Calvin Coolidge and Coolidge’s successor although he’d never before run for public office.  The Great Depression started during the first year of his term in 1929 but Hoover, who believed in “rugged individualism,” refused to allow the government to help.  The unemployment rate was 25 percent when he left office in 1933.

Richard Nixon famously said, “I am not a crook,” and proved otherwise.  He launched major international initiatives, opening up China with his visit there in 1972, and negotiating the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty with the Soviet Union the same year.  But he kept an “enemies list” and his 1974 reelection campaign saw the break-in at Democratic National Headquarters and subsequent cover-up that became the Watergate scandal.  One of his cabinet secretaries said this flip side of Nixon the internationalist was “a petty, hateful and paranoid person.” He was only president to resign while in office.

Republican George W. Bush lost the popular vote to Democrat Al Gore in 2000, but became president after the Supreme Court, voting along party lines, stopped a Florida recount with Bush’s margin in that state around 500 votes.  He invaded Iraq on the pretense that it was developing weapons of mass destruction, none of which were found.  The resulting instability produced the murderous Islamic State terrorist movement.  

Now Americans have elected in Donald Trump, a nominal Republican, a businessman with no military or government experience who tapped deep-seated economic fears in the electorate.  His campaign of attacks, insults, and untruths revealed a disgust with political elites that nonetheless threatens the institutions that have made the United States the world’s pre-eminent global power and model of stability since World War II.

We have survived similar tremors to the political bedrock of America.  It will be up to all Americans to make sure that we survive this one. 

 

 

 

Remembering 9/11 Fifteen Years Later

by Nick Taylor

On a cool bright morning fifteen years ago our house shook as a plane roared low overhead. A few seconds later the jet roar ended in a “thump.”  I thought it sounded like a bomb exploding underwater and maybe it was a military exercise.  In New York harbor?

The truth crashed in soon enough.  Contractors were working in our house.  One of them came to the door breathless: “A plane hit the World Trade Center!”  I ran outside with him and joined the crowd gathering on Seventh Avenue at Bleecker Street.  A deep gash near the top of the North Tower, smoke, flames.  The unspoken conviction that this was no accident. 

Back at home, exciting radio voices talked about what I had just seen.  It was a Tuesday morning, primary election day, and we were going to vote before Barbara left for work at WWOR-TV across the river in New Jersey.  Now, she shifted gears to head for the scene.  I needed to help her.

We walked downtown on Seventh Avenue.  I was wearing shorts and flip-flops, carrying a bag of Barbara’s gear, the binoculars around my neck banging on my chest.  I’ve wondered why I didn’t take a camera.  I think back on what we saw and I wouldn’t want to look at it again.

We pressed on, now walking against a stream of people leading north, away from the towers.  We could only see the North Tower; we didn’t know the South Tower had been rammed as well. 

The police were starting to close off access to the area around the towers but Barbara showed her press card and we went through.  We got to Vesey Street just a block from the North Tower. Three off-duty police detectives were the only other people there.  High above us, people trapped at the top of the tower by the flames below them were waving from the broken windows, pleading to be rescued.

Then they began to fall.  Or to jump.  The heat must have been awful.  It forced humans to choose how they would die.  Some chose not to die alone.  They left the tower holding hands, plummeting to certain death but grasping another human being, another connection, as long as it would hold.  Maybe there was some comfort in those last seconds on the long way down.  I hope so.

A new roar gathered and grew and the detectives yelled, “Run, it’s coming down.”  And we ran north from Vesey, me trailing in my stupid flip-flops, as the debris and dust of the collapsing South Tower billowed around the corner and toward us. 

From that point we retreated north.  We stopped at a McDonalds on Church Street while Barbara tried to call her station.  Now the streets filled with shreds of paper.  We had no sense of the danger.  The North Tower still stood.  Phone and cell service was all dead, so we kept on north.

I think we were at Chambers Street when the North Tower fell.  It went straight down, fell into itself, 110 stories disappearing as if into a hole leaving nothing but a mushroom of smoke and then, in the wake, more billows of paper dancing and falling like gray snow.

All around us, people watched with their hands on their mouths and tears in their eyes.  How to describe what we all felt?  We had watched people die.  We were alive.  What would happen next?  What of our city?  What of our lives?

Barbara found a TV truck from FOX 5, her sister station, at Broome Street and immediately took a microphone and went to work.  I went home and watched TV coverage that relived the destruction over and over.

In the days to come, we lived in isolation south of Fourteenth Street for some time.  Barbara trekked to Christopher Street and the West Side Highway every day, where all the TV trucks lined up along what came to be known as Point Thank You.  Volunteers from all over the country passed the same route.  

They came to lend a hand clearing rubble, delivering water and food to the workers at Ground Zero, bringing their rescue dogs to search for survivors, of which there were none.

Fifteen years have passed.  Memorial pools now lie in the footprints of the towers.  Water pours down their sides and disappears metaphorically into square drains at the center. 

9/11 Memorial

Names of the people who died in the two towers, of the fire and police officers whose first instinct was to rush to the danger and not away from it, those names are carved into the walls surrounding the two pools. 

9/11 Memorial Names

There’s a museum to that tragic day.  A new tower is raised.  Tourists have returned to New York.  It’s more vibrant than ever.  We’re a remarkable city, a city of pain, but a city of joy.

Elena Ferrante writes in My Brilliant Friend, “ . . . they thought that what happened before was past and, in order to live quietly, they placed a stone on top of it, and so, without knowing it, they continued it, they were immersed in the things of before…”

We can never forget September 11.  We should never forget it, the selflessness, the heroism, the instinct to hold on to someone else.  But we should not become immersed in it.  We wake up to a new world every day.

 

freedom-tower-from-seventh-avenue 

Scam Calls From “Microsoft”

by Nick Taylor

If you have caller ID, note this number: 516-635-4085. That’s supposed to be in Brookhaven, New York, but it’s not. If somebody calls from that number, crank up your scam alert antenna

The caller may say his name is Travis or Dave, but he speaks with a South Asian accent and is calling from a telephone boiler room with a lot more voices in the background. He’ll say he’s calling from Microsoft to tell you that there’s something wrong with your computer.

The first few times I got this call I said I didn’t use Microsoft and hung up. They kept coming, and I ignored them. They still didn’t stop, and I finally decided that ConsumerMojo’s users should hear what’s going on with this scam.

Here’s the full extent of the foolishness that these folks are attempting to foist on gullible people.  It’s one of the the latest versions of the Nigerian prince’s widow needing your help and bank account info.

The conversation Travis and I had went like this:

Travis: “Our server has sent you a lot of updates regarding the system driver and you have not responded to any of them, so your system driver has stopped functioning.”

Me: “What?”

Travis: “The system driver of your computer is not working in a proper manner.”

Me: “What can I do about it?”

Travis: “Are you at your computer?”

Travis told me to look at the lower right hand corner of your screen. To allay the suspicion he may have heard in my voice – or perhaps derision — he said, “So I am just guiding you, and you are correcting it yourself.”

Well, there was nothing relevant to his quest in the lower right hand corner of my screen and a few seconds later he hung up because I was asking too many questions.

The same calls were coming on my cell phone several times a day and as early as 7:30 in the morning. That was until I engaged that day’s Travis in a conversation. I heard his pitch and said,

Me: “So you’re calling people and hoping they’re stupid enough to turn over control of their computers so you can download their personal and banking information.”

He said something about my insulting him. 

“That’s not an insult,” I said. “I’m just stating facts.” Then that Travis hung up, too, and I haven’t had any more calls from 516-635-4085 on either my cell phone or my landline.

Maybe that’s the best way to get rid of those calls once and for all – talk to them, waste their time, let them know you know what they’re up to, and get a place of honor on a Do Not Call list they’ll pay attention to.

Microsoft knows about these scam calls and says scammers may try to:

  • Trick you into installing malicious software that could capture sensitive data, such as online banking user names and passwords.
  • They might also then charge you to remove this malware.
  • Convince you to visit legitimate websites (like www.ammyy.com) to download software that will allow them to take control of your computer remotely and adjust settings to leave your computer vulnerable.
  • Request credit card information and bill you for phony services.
  • Direct you to fraudulent websites and ask you to enter credit card and other personal or financial information there.

Microsoft also warns that they may call you and claim that they represent: 

  • Windows Helpdesk
  • Windows Service Center
  • Microsoft Tech Support
  • Microsoft Support
  • Windows Technical Department Support Group
  • Microsoft Research and Development Group or Microsoft R & D

If you receive a scam call, Microsoft asks that you report the call and provide the caller’s number directly to Microsoft and to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

The FTC took legal action against Indian boiler room scammers in 2012, but apparently a new generation of Indian scammers continues the tradition of targeting computer users in the U.S., the U.K. and other English-speaking countries.

In New York staffers at the Better Business Bureau posted a scam call that they received so you can hear it. 

 

Why MyLife Gets Zero Stars

 

by Nick Taylor

If you’re like me, you get at least an email a day from MyLife.com. It says: “You May Have a Personal Review.” It goes on to say that an “old friend, colleague, relative or ex may have reviewed you. See what they had to say.”

Then there’s the news that I’ve had one review and my personal rating has changed. How it changes based on one review is anybody’s guess. MyLife makes it clear they have my name, address, phone number and age, as if to prove how vulnerable I am.

I never click on the “View Details Now” window because from what I read of consumer reviews that’s a route to being scammed. For example, after looking at the MyLife website I got an email that thanked me for visiting, and told me, “We may have found at least 1 negative record on your background report . . .” Which I can access for $1.

Not one review I’ve read says anything with MyLife stops at $1. You’re invited to join at an introductory monthly rate, but if you give your credit card info you’re charged for a year. Refunds are hard to get, say the reviews.

Okay, so MyLife has the same information anybody could have gotten from an old phone book. It tells me I’ve had one review, shows a rating of 3.5 of 5 stars, and tries to push my worry buttons by telling me somebody else may have reviewed me and that my rating has changed.

I’ve also been invited by email to make millions by helping the children of Nigerian princes to relocate their money to the United States using my bank account information.

But today’s MyLife emails were worse. They invited me to write reviews about people I know. One of them was a friend I see in person fairly often. I also correspond with him from time to time by email, and we are Facebook friends. Facebook is surely the exposure culprit here.

And if I reviewed him, MyLife undoubtedly would pepper him with incessant prompts to find out what his new reviewer may have said.

The second email asked me to review my neighbors across the street: “Write a good review about your neighbors and they’ll probably do the same for you.“ Maybe so, but why would either of us care? So home shoppers on my street would be more or less eager to move in? No, this invitation to invade my neighbors’ privacy is a first step MyLife’s route to their credit card information.

I’m going to write one review today. MyLife gets zero stars.

We emailed MyLife for a response, and so far we haven’t heard from the company.

Glaucoma Update: Glanatec and Rhopressa

by Nick Taylor

Since a doctor, in 2008, diagnosed that I suffer from pseudo exfoliation syndrome glaucoma, I have been through a series of trials and tried a variety of medications to save my vision. My doctor, Robert Ritch, works on the cutting edge of ocular science and has included me in several trials.

Last year I wrote about having to order a rho-kinase inhibitor (ROCK) eye drop from Japan to fight the intra-ocular pressure (IOP) of glaucoma. It’s this pressure on the optic nerve that causes the deteriorating vision that’s symptomatic of glaucoma. I had to order Glanatec from the Mimaki Family Pharmacy in Hong Kong because Aerie Pharmaceutical, an American maker, ended the trial of an effective ROCK drop I was taking.

Glanatec wasn’t as effective as the Aerie ROCK drop, but it did help keep my pressure at manageable levels in the low 20s. But it was a lower strength, so I took it twice a day versus once for the Aerie product. As in the Aerie trial I’d been a part of, I took it in the right eye only.

Eventually, the skin around the inner part of my right eye started crusting and itching. That eye also watered and turned red. A common ROCK drop side effect is noticeable redness after you put the drop in. But this was more chronic.

I asked Dr. Ritch for his opinion. He said to stop the Glanatec and after a week come in to have my pressure checked. Which I did. The reading jumped around, but it stayed in the low 20s. So now I’m back on my routine before the Aerie ROCK drop trial — pilocarpine in both eyes in the morning and at night, and Travatan Z in both eyes at night.

Meanwhile, there’s potentially good news from Aerie Pharmaceutical. It  announced good results for its Rhopressa ROCK drop as a once-a-day alternative to other IOP-lowering drops containing beta blockers that you take more frequently.

Glaucoma care is an evolving field. Dr. Ritch is at the forefront of it, so I’m glad I’m in his hands and I’ll keep posting updates.